The Final Curtain Call?
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.


Do You Think That Michael Jackson Hoaxed His Death? Do You Think That There was A conspiracy To Murder Michael Jackson? Lets Talk!
 
HomeHome  PortalPortal  Latest imagesLatest images  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

 

 Michaels prints not found on ANY propofol bottles

Go down 
4 posters
AuthorMessage
dareme
Admin
Admin
dareme


Posts : 6382
Join date : 2009-10-06
Age : 53
Location : MJ's closet

Michaels prints not  found on ANY propofol bottles Empty
PostSubject: Michaels prints not found on ANY propofol bottles   Michaels prints not  found on ANY propofol bottles EmptyWed Oct 05, 2011 1:21 am

I got this off of MJJEternal. I kinda thought we already knew this but maybe we only knew about the one by the bed.

ABC News has just broke the story that Michael Jackson's fingerprints were not found on any of the propofol bottles found in his bedroom or on thoes in the possesion of Dr Murray.
This could be mayjor evidence in the case and be a massive setback for the defence who have said that Michael administered the lethal dose himself.

For the full story go to http://abcnews.go.com/US/Conrad_Murr...ry?id=14662986

Full article added:

None of the fingerprints on propofol bottles found in Michael Jackson's bedroom or in his doctor's possession belonged to the king of pop, sources close to the investigation told ABC News.

That revelation might deal a crippling blow to Dr. Conrad Murray's defense theory that Jackson himself took a lethal dose of propofol and the sedative lorazepam without Murray's knowledge, creating a "perfect storm in his body that killed him instantly." Murray is on trial for Jackson's death and could face four years in prison if convicted of involuntary manslaughter.

In opening statements, defense attorney Ed Chernoff told jurors that Murray was actually trying to wean Jackson off the creamy anesthetic and that he had given him only 25 mg of the drug June 25, 2009, the day the singer died.

"When Dr. Murray came into the room and found Michael Jackson, there was no CPR, there was no doctor, no paramedic, no machine that was going to revive Michael Jackson," Chernoff said. "He died so rapidly, so instantly, he didn't even have time to close his eyes."

Prosecutors contend that Murray was reckless in his care of Jackson and that he failed to properly monitor the singer. Propofol is typically administered in a hospital setting. Prosecutors also argued that Murray did not let first responders and doctors know that he was treating Jackson with propofol.

Meanwhile, Murray's former girlfriends, Nicole Alvarez and Sade Anding, are expected to take the stand today. The prosecution says Murray had phone conversations with the women on the day Jackson died. He also had bottles of propofol shipped to Alvarez's Santa Monica, Calif., home.

Murray's one-time girlfriend Bridgette Morgan told jurors Monday that she called Murray on the day of Jackson's death, but that he didn't pick up the phone.

Aside from the testimony of Morgan, Monday's testimony in the manslaughter trial centered on the efforts of emergency room doctors at UCLA Medical Center to revive an already dead king of pop.

Cardiologist Thao Nguyen said Murray "sounded desperate" and "looked devastated" in the hospital. Both Nguyen and Dr. Richelle Cooper said that Jackson appeared dead when they saw him and that he showed no signs of life throughout their efforts to restart his hearth.

Nguyen also testified that when she began to ask Murray questions, he was not able to tell her the time Jackson stopped breathing, when medication was administered to him that day or the interval of time between the two events.

"He said he did not have any concept of time," Nguyen told the court Monday. "He did not have a watch."

She added that when she "specifically asked" Murray if Jackson had taken any other sedatives or narcotics, "his reply was negative."

The defense did appear to bolster their argument when one of the emergency room doctors said that even if she had known that Jackson had taken propofol, she would not have been able to revive the singer.

"Had Dr. Murray told you he had given 25 mg of propofol at 10:30, would it have altered your treatment of Michael Jackson?" asked defense attorney Michael Flanagan.

"No," answered the Dr. Cooper, who was on duty at UCLA Medical Center's emergency room the night Jackson died.
"Would that have altered the result that happened to Michael Jackson?" Flanagan asked.

"As I said, Mr. Jackson died long before he became my patient," Cooper answered. "Knowing more, it's still unlikely I could have done something different to him."

Murray told Cooper that he was treating the singer for dehydration and that Jackson had no history of health problems, witnesses have testified.

ABC News' Christina Caron contributed to this report
Back to top Go down
TracyK
Admin
Admin
TracyK


Posts : 6638
Join date : 2009-10-06
Age : 50
Location : In here

Michaels prints not  found on ANY propofol bottles Empty
PostSubject: Re: Michaels prints not found on ANY propofol bottles   Michaels prints not  found on ANY propofol bottles EmptyWed Oct 05, 2011 1:48 am

I have NO doubt that MJ didn't touch that stuff!
Back to top Go down
https://finalcurtaincall.forumotion.net
vbond

vbond


Posts : 1265
Join date : 2009-10-08

Michaels prints not  found on ANY propofol bottles Empty
PostSubject: Re: Michaels prints not found on ANY propofol bottles   Michaels prints not  found on ANY propofol bottles EmptyWed Oct 05, 2011 2:46 pm

Where does this info come from? It hasn't come out in the courtroom yet.

I don't believe MJ took propofol while Murray was out of the room either.
Back to top Go down
dareme
Admin
Admin
dareme


Posts : 6382
Join date : 2009-10-06
Age : 53
Location : MJ's closet

Michaels prints not  found on ANY propofol bottles Empty
PostSubject: Re: Michaels prints not found on ANY propofol bottles   Michaels prints not  found on ANY propofol bottles EmptyWed Oct 05, 2011 4:26 pm

Another secret source but reported on abcnews.com. No I dont believe MJ did either.
Back to top Go down
ksk
Mod
Mod
ksk


Posts : 3992
Join date : 2009-10-06
Location : The State of Deep Denial

Michaels prints not  found on ANY propofol bottles Empty
PostSubject: Re: Michaels prints not found on ANY propofol bottles   Michaels prints not  found on ANY propofol bottles EmptyWed Oct 05, 2011 7:58 pm

Even if there were Michael fingerprints on any of the bottles, Murray left the room after he injected propofol, which he should not have done. He was supposed to sit there and monitor and if need be, pee in one if those urine jugs they were displaying today. The fact remains that he injected and left the patient unattended.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





Michaels prints not  found on ANY propofol bottles Empty
PostSubject: Re: Michaels prints not found on ANY propofol bottles   Michaels prints not  found on ANY propofol bottles Empty

Back to top Go down
 
Michaels prints not found on ANY propofol bottles
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» What is everyone expecting if/ when Michael is found?

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
The Final Curtain Call? :: The Trial: **A VERDICT IS IN!**-
Jump to: